Screener
KEAT vs BINV
Keating Active ETF vs Brandes International ETF
Key differences
- BINV costs 0.15% less per year.
- BINV is significantly larger than KEAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KEAT covers north america markets; BINV covers global.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEAT | BINV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $120M | $482M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.20% | 2.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.23% | 13.97% |
| Max drawdown | -7.45% | -14.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEAT and BINV
Explore further