Screener
KEAT vs CGCV
Keating Active ETF vs Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGCV costs 0.52% less per year.
- CGCV is significantly larger than KEAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KEAT follows a active selection strategy; CGCV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEAT | CGCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $120M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.20% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +19.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.23% | 9.82% |
| Max drawdown | -7.45% | -13.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEAT and CGCV
Explore further