Screener
KEAT vs DYNF
Keating Active ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- DYNF costs 0.59% less per year.
- DYNF is significantly larger than KEAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DYNF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEAT | DYNF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $120M | $34.0B |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.20% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.23% | 12.60% |
| Max drawdown | -7.45% | -34.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEAT and DYNF
Explore further