Screener
KEAT vs ENHI
Keating Active ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
- ENHI costs 0.58% less per year.
- KEAT is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KEAT is classified as equity, while ENHI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEAT | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $120M | $11M |
| Since | 2024 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 2.20% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.23% | — |
| Max drawdown | -7.45% | -5.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEAT and ENHI
Explore further