Screener
KEAT vs RFFC
Keating Active ETF vs ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Key differences
Both KEAT and RFFC are equity ETFs. KEAT charges 0.85% a year and RFFC 0.48%. The main difference: RFFC costs 0.37% less per year.
- RFFC costs 0.37% less per year.
- KEAT is much larger than RFFC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEAT | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $123M | $30M |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.24% | 0.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.4% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.47% | 12.26% |
| Max drawdown | -7.45% | -36.26% |
Similar to KEAT and RFFC
Explore further