Screener
KJUL vs KMAY
Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - May
Key differences
- KJUL is significantly larger than KMAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KJUL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KJUL | KMAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $135M | $14M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.3% | +17.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.17% | 6.31% |
| Max drawdown | -16.69% | -2.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KJUL and KMAY
Explore further