Screener
KJUN vs PWV
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June vs Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- PWV costs 0.24% less per year.
- PWV is significantly larger than KJUN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KJUN is classified as alternative, while PWV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KJUN follows a structured outcome strategy; PWV uses index tracking.
- PWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KJUN | PWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2024 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.83% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.6% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.64% | 9.41% |
| Max drawdown | -14.44% | -37.67% |
Similar to KJUN and PWV
Explore further