Screener
KJUN vs VONE
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June vs Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VONE costs 0.73% less per year.
- VONE is significantly larger than KJUN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KJUN is classified as alternative, while VONE is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KJUN follows a structured outcome strategy; VONE uses index tracking.
- VONE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KJUN | VONE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $10.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.1% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.65% | 12.13% |
| Max drawdown | -14.44% | -34.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KJUN and VONE
Explore further