Screener
KMAR vs BKLN
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March vs Invesco Senior Loan ETF
Key differences
- BKLN costs 0.14% less per year.
- BKLN is significantly larger than KMAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KMAR is classified as alternative, while BKLN is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- KMAR follows a structured outcome strategy; BKLN uses index tracking.
- BKLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KMAR | BKLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $35M | $6.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 6.91% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.38% | 2.75% |
| Max drawdown | -10.06% | -24.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KMAR and BKLN
Explore further