Screener
KMAY vs KJUL
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - May vs Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July
Key differences
- KJUL is significantly larger than KMAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KJUL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KMAY | KJUL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $135M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.6% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.31% | 8.17% |
| Max drawdown | -2.38% | -16.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KMAY and KJUL
Explore further