Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

KOMP vs CTEX

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF vs ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF

KOMP

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$2.7B

CTEX

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF

ProShares

Annual cost

0.58%

Fund size

$6M

Key differences

  • KOMP costs 0.38% less per year.
  • KOMP is significantly larger than CTEX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, KOMP has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

KOMPCTEX
Annual cost (TER)0.20%0.58%
Fund size (AUM)$2.7B$6M
Since20182021
Dividend yield1.60%1.85%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+49.3%+156.4%
CAGR 3Y+22.5%+18.2%
CAGR 5Y+4.8%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.840.53
Volatility 1Y23.05%41.38%
Max drawdown-50.06%-70.30%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to KOMP and CTEX