Skip to content
Screener

KOMP vs SPTM

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF

KOMP

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$3.0B

SPTM

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF

Annual cost

0.03%

Fund size

$13.6B

Key differences

Both KOMP and SPTM are equity ETFs. KOMP charges 0.20% a year and SPTM 0.03%. The main difference: KOMP covers global markets; SPTM covers North America.

  • KOMP covers global markets; SPTM covers North America.
  • SPTM costs 0.17% less per year.
  • SPTM is much larger than KOMP. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, SPTM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • SPTM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

KOMPSPTM
Annual cost (TER)0.20%0.03%
Fund size (AUM)$3.0B$13.6B
Since20182000
Dividend yield1.42%1.04%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+36.1%+25.1%
CAGR 3Y+19.3%+21.4%
CAGR 5Y+2.2%+13.1%
Sharpe 3Y0.721.14
Volatility 1Y24.57%12.34%
Max drawdown-50.06%-34.67%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to KOMP and SPTM