Skip to content
Screener

KOMP vs SPXN

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF vs ProShares S&P 500 ex-Financials ETF

KOMP

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$3.0B

SPXN

ProShares S&P 500 ex-Financials ETF

Annual cost

0.09%

Fund size

$79M

Key differences

Both KOMP and SPXN are equity ETFs. KOMP charges 0.20% a year and SPXN 0.09%. The main difference: KOMP covers global markets; SPXN covers North America.

  • KOMP covers global markets; SPXN covers North America.
  • SPXN costs 0.11% less per year.
  • KOMP is much larger than SPXN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, SPXN has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

KOMPSPXN
Annual cost (TER)0.20%0.09%
Fund size (AUM)$3.0B$79M
Since20182015
Dividend yield1.42%0.87%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+36.1%+28.2%
CAGR 3Y+19.3%+22.5%
CAGR 5Y+2.2%+14.3%
Sharpe 3Y0.721.15
Volatility 1Y24.57%13.21%
Max drawdown-50.06%-32.10%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to KOMP and SPXN