Screener
KONG vs AFSM
Formidable Fortress ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- AFSM costs 0.14% less per year.
- AFSM is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while AFSM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; AFSM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AFSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | AFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $94M |
| Since | 2021 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.49% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 17.84% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -43.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and AFSM
Explore further