Screener
KONG vs AMAX
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
Both KONG and AMAX are alternative ETFs. KONG charges 0.89% a year and AMAX 1.36%. The main difference: KONG costs 0.47% less per year.
- KONG costs 0.47% less per year.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $64M |
| Since | 2021 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 10.96% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +8.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.4% | +8.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.42 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.95% | 10.31% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -16.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.