Screener
KONG vs CGGO
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.42% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while CGGO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +38.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.90% | 16.82% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -24.90% |
Similar to KONG and CGGO
Explore further