Screener
KONG vs CGIC
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGIC costs 0.35% less per year.
- CGIC is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while CGIC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; CGIC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | CGIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 1.38% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.90% | 15.05% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -13.10% |
Similar to KONG and CGIC
Explore further