Screener
KONG vs CWS
Formidable Fortress ETF vs AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
Key differences
- CWS costs 0.24% less per year.
- CWS is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while CWS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; CWS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CWS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $155M |
| Since | 2021 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.31% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | -0.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 13.34% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -33.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and CWS
Explore further