Screener
KONG vs DFUS
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
Key differences
- DFUS costs 0.80% less per year.
- DFUS is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while DFUS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; DFUS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DFUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFUS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | DFUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $19.9B |
| Since | 2021 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.87% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +29.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 12.37% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -24.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and DFUS
Explore further