Screener
KONG vs DGRO
Formidable Fortress ETF vs iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
Key differences
KONG is an alternative ETF, while DGRO is an equity ETF. KONG charges 0.89% a year and DGRO 0.08%.
- KONG is an alternative fund, while DGRO is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; DGRO uses index tracking.
- DGRO costs 0.81% less per year.
- DGRO is much larger than KONG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, DGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DGRO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | DGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $40.5B |
| Since | 2021 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 1.96% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.8% | +18.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 9.52% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -35.10% |
Similar to KONG and DGRO
Explore further