Screener
KONG vs FDG
Formidable Fortress ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- FDG costs 0.44% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while FDG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; FDG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $387M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +37.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.90% | 17.85% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and FDG
Explore further