Screener
KONG vs FPAG
Formidable Fortress ETF vs FPA Global Equity ETF
Key differences
KONG is an alternative ETF, while FPAG is an equity ETF. KONG charges 0.89% a year and FPAG 0.49%.
- KONG is an alternative fund, while FPAG is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; FPAG uses index tracking.
- FPAG costs 0.40% less per year.
- FPAG is much larger than KONG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, FPAG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | FPAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $517M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.50 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.92% | 14.85% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -28.43% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.