Screener
KONG vs MAGO
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF
Key differences
Both KONG and MAGO are alternative ETFs. KONG charges 0.89% a year and MAGO 0.99%. The main difference: KONG costs 0.10% less per year.
- KONG costs 0.10% less per year.
- KONG is much larger than MAGO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | MAGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $2M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.42 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.95% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -17.98% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.