Screener
KONG vs TGRW
Formidable Fortress ETF vs T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
Key differences
- TGRW costs 0.37% less per year.
- TGRW is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while TGRW is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; TGRW uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TGRW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | TGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $972M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +24.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.90% | 16.60% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -43.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and TGRW
Explore further