Screener
KONG vs TMAT
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Main Thematic Innovation ETF
Key differences
- TMAT costs 0.07% less per year.
- TMAT is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, TMAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | TMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.82% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $211M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.02% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +41.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 23.91% |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -58.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and TMAT
Explore further