Screener
KPHO vs EIDO
KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF vs iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF
Key differences
Both KPHO and EIDO are equity ETFs. KPHO charges 1.03% a year and EIDO 0.59%. The main difference: EIDO costs 0.44% less per year.
- EIDO costs 0.44% less per year.
- EIDO is much larger than KPHO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EIDO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KPHO | EIDO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $289M |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.26% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -36.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 23.22% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -59.41% |
Similar to KPHO and EIDO
Explore further