Screener
KRMA vs PFFV
Global X Conscious Companies ETF vs Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFFV costs 0.18% less per year.
- KRMA is classified as equity, while PFFV is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, KRMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KRMA | PFFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $116M | $302M |
| Since | 2016 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.46% | 8.13% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.1% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +8.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.0% | +2.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.33% | 4.20% |
| Max drawdown | -36.16% | -18.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KRMA and PFFV
Explore further