Screener
LABU vs TECS
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- LABU costs 0.05% less per year.
- LABU is significantly larger than TECS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LABU follows a leveraged strategy; TECS uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, LABU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TECS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LABU | TECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 1.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $528M | $80M |
| Since | 2015 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.69% | 5.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +246.3% | -77.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.2% | -64.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -32.0% | -57.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | -1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 75.02% | 61.39% |
| Max drawdown | -98.96% | -99.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LABU and TECS
Explore further