Screener
LCR vs GIGB
Leuthold Core ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GIGB costs 0.76% less per year.
- GIGB is significantly larger than LCR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LCR is classified as mixed asset, while GIGB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- LCR follows a active selection strategy; GIGB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, LCR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LCR | GIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $70M | $907M |
| Since | 2020 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.35% | 4.70% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.8% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.52% | 4.40% |
| Max drawdown | -17.44% | -22.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LCR and GIGB
Explore further