Screener
LCR vs KAT
Leuthold Core ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- KAT costs 0.09% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than LCR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LCR is classified as mixed asset, while KAT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LCR | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $70M | $688M |
| Since | 2020 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.35% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.52% | — |
| Max drawdown | -17.44% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LCR and KAT
Explore further