Screener
LFEQ vs BLV
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Vanguard Long-Term Bond Fund
Key differences
- BLV costs 0.55% less per year.
- BLV is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while BLV is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; BLV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | BLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $8.5B |
| Since | 2017 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 4.77% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +2.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | -2.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | -0.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 8.32% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -38.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and BLV
Explore further