Screener
LFEQ vs FTMA
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Inc ETF
Key differences
- FTMA costs 0.23% less per year.
- FTMA is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while FTMA is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; FTMA uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | FTMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $273M |
| Since | 2017 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 3.15% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | — |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -2.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and FTMA
Explore further