Screener
LFEQ vs GPZ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 0.18% less per year.
- GPZ is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while GPZ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; GPZ uses index tracking.
- LFEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | GPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $245M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.13% | — |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -31.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and GPZ
Explore further