Screener
LFEQ vs HYD
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs VanEck High Yield Muni ETF
Key differences
- HYD costs 0.26% less per year.
- HYD is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while HYD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; HYD uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HYD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | HYD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $4.2B |
| Since | 2017 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 4.33% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | -0.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 4.07% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -35.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and HYD
Explore further