Screener
LFEQ vs RBUF
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
Key differences
- LFEQ costs 0.21% less per year.
- RBUF is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; RBUF uses structured outcome.
- LFEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | RBUF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $86M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +16.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 6.35% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -11.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and RBUF
Explore further