Screener
LFEQ vs TBLL
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF
Key differences
- TBLL costs 0.50% less per year.
- TBLL is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while TBLL is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; TBLL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | TBLL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 3.82% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +3.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 2.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 0.19% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -0.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and TBLL
Explore further