Screener
LFEQ vs VRP
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- VRP costs 0.08% less per year.
- VRP is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while VRP is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; VRP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | VRP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2017 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 6.39% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +4.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 2.89% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -46.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and VRP
Explore further