Screener
LFEQ vs VTWO
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VTWO costs 0.52% less per year.
- VTWO is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while VTWO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; VTWO uses index tracking.
- VTWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $16.6B |
| Since | 2017 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +45.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +19.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 19.22% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -41.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and VTWO
Explore further