Screener
LFEQ vs VUG
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs Vanguard Growth Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VUG costs 0.55% less per year.
- VUG is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ is classified as alternative, while VUG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; VUG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VUG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VUG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | VUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $365.0B |
| Since | 2017 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.40% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +15.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 15.91% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -35.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and VUG
Explore further