Screener
LFEQ vs YJUN
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF vs FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June
Key differences
- LFEQ costs 0.32% less per year.
- YJUN is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LFEQ covers north america markets; YJUN covers global.
- LFEQ follows a tactical allocation strategy; YJUN uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LFEQ | YJUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $131M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +11.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 6.88% |
| Max drawdown | -35.19% | -21.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LFEQ and YJUN
Explore further