Screener
LGOV vs ICSH
First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
Both LGOV and ICSH are fixed income ETFs. LGOV charges 0.49% a year and ICSH 0.08%. The main difference: LGOV follows a index tracking strategy; ICSH uses active selection.
- LGOV follows a index tracking strategy; ICSH uses active selection.
- ICSH costs 0.41% less per year.
- ICSH is much larger than LGOV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ICSH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICSH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LGOV | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $664M | $7.6B |
| Since | 2019 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.25% | 4.38% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.8% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.7% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.04 | 3.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.02% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -30.85% | -3.94% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.