Skip to content
Screener

LMBS vs DSCO

First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF vs DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF

LMBS

First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF

Annual cost

0.66%

Fund size

$6.3B

DSCO

DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$195M

Key differences

Both LMBS and DSCO are fixed income ETFs. LMBS charges 0.66% a year and DSCO 0.50%. The main difference: LMBS follows a index tracking strategy; DSCO uses active selection.

  • LMBS follows a index tracking strategy; DSCO uses active selection.
  • DSCO costs 0.16% less per year.
  • LMBS is much larger than DSCO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • LMBS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

LMBSDSCO
Annual cost (TER)0.66%0.50%
Fund size (AUM)$6.3B$195M
Since20142019
Dividend yield4.10%5.54%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+5.9%N/A
CAGR 3Y+5.8%N/A
CAGR 5Y+3.1%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.83N/A
Volatility 1Y1.94%
Max drawdown-6.48%-1.62%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to LMBS and DSCO