Screener
LMBS vs FOPC
First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF vs Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF
Key differences
Both LMBS and FOPC are fixed income ETFs. LMBS charges 0.66% a year and FOPC 0.87%. The main difference: LMBS follows a index tracking strategy; FOPC uses active selection.
- LMBS follows a index tracking strategy; FOPC uses active selection.
- LMBS costs 0.21% less per year.
- LMBS is much larger than FOPC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- LMBS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LMBS | FOPC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.87% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.3B | $34M |
| Since | 2014 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.10% | 4.26% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.94% | 2.87% |
| Max drawdown | -6.48% | -2.18% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.