Screener
LNGX vs ICLN
Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.06% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than LNGX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LNGX covers north america markets; ICLN covers global.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LNGX | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +78.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 25.99% |
| Max drawdown | -13.42% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LNGX and ICLN
Explore further