Screener
LNGX vs RSSL
Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- RSSL costs 0.37% less per year.
- RSSL is significantly larger than LNGX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| LNGX | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.19% |
| Max drawdown | -13.42% | -27.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LNGX and RSSL
Explore further