Screener
LNGX vs URA
Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF vs Global X Uranium ETF
Key differences
- LNGX costs 0.24% less per year.
- URA is significantly larger than LNGX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- URA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LNGX | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $7.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +65.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +41.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +23.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 49.70% |
| Max drawdown | -13.42% | -61.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LNGX and URA
Explore further