Screener
LOWV vs FDLO
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF vs Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
Key differences
- FDLO costs 0.24% less per year.
- FDLO is significantly larger than LOWV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LOWV follows a active selection strategy; FDLO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, LOWV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FDLO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LOWV | FDLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $199M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.7% | +17.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | +14.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.56% | 8.91% |
| Max drawdown | -13.87% | -34.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LOWV and FDLO
Explore further