Screener
LOWV vs VFMV
AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF vs Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF ETF Shares
Key differences
- VFMV costs 0.26% less per year.
- LOWV follows a active selection strategy; VFMV uses index tracking.
- VFMV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LOWV | VFMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $199M | $421M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.7% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | +15.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.56% | 8.86% |
| Max drawdown | -13.87% | -33.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LOWV and VFMV
Explore further