Screener
LQ vs AMAX
Simplify Tax Aware Alternatives ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- LQ costs 1.21% less per year.
- LQ is classified as equity, while AMAX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- LQ follows a active selection strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LQ | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $60M |
| Since | 2026 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 10.63% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.01% |
| Max drawdown | -2.82% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LQ and AMAX
Explore further