Screener
LQDH vs IGHG
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF vs ProShares Investment Grade—Interest Rate Hedged
Key differences
- LQDH costs 0.06% less per year.
- LQDH is classified as fixed income, while IGHG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- LQDH follows a index tracking strategy; IGHG uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| LQDH | IGHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $506M | $276M |
| Since | 2014 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 6.11% | 5.14% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.5% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.6% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.3% | +5.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.38 | 1.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.73% | 3.50% |
| Max drawdown | -24.63% | -25.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LQDH and IGHG
Explore further